Australia and Brazil – Future Partners in Global
Agricultural Leadership Concept
I have been asked to expand on the concept of Australia and
Brazil as ‘G2’ Partners in Global
Agriculture that I presentedin my opening remarks as part of a panel at the Australia-Brazil Agribusiness
Forum recently held Sydney and I thought I could share it here as well.
My fellow panelists included the very distinguished Dr
Marcos Jank – a policy and research expert from Brazil - and fellow ex Austrade
colleague Tony Eyres an Investment specialist in Brazilian agriculture and the
agricultural opportunities being presented in the opening up of Australia’s
north.
The entire panel is convinced of the opportunity to
cooperate more closely together but I chose to use the more expansive term - ‘G2’ - as a sort of brand metaphor and copying
the concept from the G7 and G20 Leadership forums.
I came to the conclusion many years ago that Brazil and
Australia – and only Brazil and
Australia - are uniquely positioned to dominate global agricultural export
production for the next several decades. The G2 concept intends to take us
beyond the simple encouragement of investment into each other’s markets by
businesses and into the realm of building a much wider, mutually beneficial,
partnering arrangement based on sharing Government policies, regulations,
research, equipment, technologies and services as well as expanding current
cooperation in General Agreements in Tariffs and Treaties matters.
My other view is that the coming together of our countries
and economies in this endeavor is not ‘happenstance’
ie some sort of lucky ‘accident’.
Rather it is underpinned by a number of inexorable global
drivers and the unique characteristics of each of our agricultural environments
that when combined, not only complement each other, but actually supplement and
expand each countries capability.
And more importantly we should assume this proposed relationship
is not just for our own individual country gains but actually for the benefit
of the world. Therefore a G2 we
should aim - as equal partners - to establish
the world’s best practice in production,
supply, logistics, nutrition and food safety.
Let me explain:
The resources and energy sector – where Australia and Brazil
are also the worlds biggest competitors - is subject to variability caused by rapid
market demand changes (think China and iron ore or coal) and oversupply through
new production sources( think both west and east Africa) whereas the demand for global food
production is rapidly heading for a sustained undersupply which cannot be easily resolved because of:
·
The worlds population is inexorably growing from
a current 6bn towards 10bn by 2050. Food security for human critical needs
falls only behind water availability as the worlds most important issue. Some
markets like the Gulf Coast Countries import more than 90% of their food requirements
today!
·
There are limited world regions with greenfield
arable land and water availability that can provide surplus food for exporting
– in reality they number less than ten and the top four dominate ( equaling the
remaining six) of which Brazil is number one and Australia is number three. The
other two are Russia and Argentina.
·
Per acre productivity performance and its
reliability requires very high levels of skill and technology. Subsistence
farming of course still exists in developing countries but it can’t scale to
meet the upcoming needs. That is this is not something you can kick start in a
new region in a couple of months.
·
Climate variation causing extreme events is
increasingly impacting on crop production around the world. Some existing
regions cannot guarantee regular supply.
·
Food nutrition, food provenance and safety
concerns are show stoppers in markets like China – think powdered milk and New
Zealand’s Fonterra a few years back or mad cows disease. And it cant be just any
food. It has to pack a punch in terms of nutrition. Empty calorie food or food
that is susceptible to fraud/knock offs cannot and will not be accepted by any
community in the future.
·
Supply chain logistics – especially cold chain
related – are expensive and complex. Crop to port logistics are also major
obstacles to getting crops or protein into export markets.
·
The growing demand in export markets for protein
products – both premium and basic – are running into new issues around the $ cost
per kilo of unit. And it’s a fodder availability as well as a water
availability issue. Its why red meat from beef cattle is becoming increasingly
more expensive and being substituted by lower cost chicken for example. China
is one of the world’s biggest producers and consumers of pork and because of
that is a huge import of fodder for those animals. So we need increased
agricultural crop production for human needs and for protein production.
·
As a separate issue at some point meat as we
have known it will become a luxury food and hence the emerge of new forms of
substitute protein. Both Brazil and Australia need to be leaders in this space.
So why does this lead us to Australia and Brazil forming a
joint global approach to agricultural production and supply to the worlds
market. Because only we can - and each
of us brings something the other doesn’t have.
It goes like this:
The demand for nutritious food for human critical needs is
beyond our current global resources. Bread, rice or potatoes are the staple in
many markets and in most of those markets basics are subsidized to ensure
citizens can be fed regularly.
The new level of demand for premium food coming out of Asia
is unprecedented and tipping the balance in some sectors of agriculture –
dairy, beef for example.
Less than four countries in the world can generate the level
of production in greenfield arable areas to meet both essential and well as
discretionary premium food demand. Two of those countries today are Brazil and
Australia and only our countries are based in the tropics - where 70% of the
worlds future population will reside!
Neither Australia or Brazil subsidise food for consumers.
Meaning we both know how to operate efficiently and in free markets.
What does this mean? In the past Brazil and Australia have
been separately successful as competitors in the global market but such is the
requirement versus capability to deliver to food to growing export markets
there is a multiplier effect to be gained if we join forces to:
·
Create policies and programmes that support
increased agricultural production to serve increasing global requirement
·
Create and share regulations that guarantee food
provenance, food safety and security
·
Share research in the efficient tropical
production of food and fibre
·
Share research in yield production and food
nutrition
·
Share research in non-meat protein design and
production
What does
agricultural experience does Brazil bring to Australia?
·
It has already had its south to north
experience. Brazilian farmers know how to open up and operate in hostile,
stressed greenfield environments. They are ideal partners to build new
agricultural production in Australia’s north.
·
Brazilian farmers understand very large, industrial scale levels of agricultural
production.
·
Brazilian farmers are highly competitive
business operators.
·
Brazil are world leaders in agriculture for
biofuels for transport and power requirements.
·
Australia’s north is a new Mato Grosso region to
them. It represents more than half our land area, is mostly under developed but
has almost all of our consistent water availability. Australia cannot increase
in any significant ways if it does not open up the north. Brazilians are the
only country experienced and knowledgeable enough to tackle this challenge and
it provides Brazilians farmers the opportunity to have production source
diversity.
·
Australia’s offers Brazil close proximity and
easy ( and easier) access to the Indo-Pacific markets.
·
Australia’s has key FTA’s with markets of
interest to Brazil.
·
Australia has an excellent reputation for food
safety and regulation. This is a missing plank in some aspects for Brazil.
·
Australia like Brazil is rapidly adopting new
technologies – from drones, to blockchain. Let’s work together on the best ones
and export our technology and services to the world.
·
Australia has outstanding agricultural and water
research institutions. Jointly we could dominate the understanding of
requirements for future global agricultural production and create products and
technologies that will set the global standard in markets where conditions are
increasingly becoming stressed.
·
As a linked but separate issue Australia has a
jet fuel availability and national reserve issue. Biofuels are an ideal substitute
for fossil-based jet fuels of which we are an importer. Identifying
opportunities in high performing non-food feedstock for jet fuel replacement
would provide a new global technology, leadership opportunity as well as new
markets such as the US DoD for example.
In closing Australia and Brazil need to stop see each other
as simply old fashioned direct competitors in each other’s markets.
Global demand for safe, nutritious food is more than enough
to sustain us as we stand. The question is do we want to do more? Can we do
more?
My proposition is that ‘yes we can’. But in order to do so
it requires us to move towards a global leadership role by partnering across
all of our levels of knowledge – from Government policies and programmes, to
regulation and governance, to research, equipment, technologies and services.
The information age is upon us. 5G, internet of things, big
data, AI, Nano technologies, smart phones, equipment and machinery. This is the
future and this is where both countries need to be. And we can and should be
the best at it.
Back to my opening statement.
Australia and Brazil - and
only Australia and Brazil – have an opportunity to join together and form
an alliance to provide the global leadership in agriculture our future world
requires.
Lets do it!
No comments:
Post a Comment